Can two reasonable readers understand a public decision, disagree about its priorities, and still identify what was authorized and what actually happened?
Two Central Saanich decision traces. Shared facts, clear authorities and measurable outcomes.
GCI makes missing public decision rules, responsible authorities and questions residents can ask as visible as the underlying project. Missing evidence is not proof of misconduct.
The unanswered questions are part of the case, not something residents must solve by inference. Council authorized design work; that is not proof that the construction budget, expenditure, or opening date has been approved or verified. GCI identifies exactly who can produce the missing record.
On February 23, 2026, Council authorized $300,000 for detailed design of Phase 2 Option 2B and requested a completed design and updated estimate.
Missing in reviewed sourcesA later Council decision authorizing construction, with its approved budget and funding sources, has not been established.
Who can clarify?Council, with a dated engineering/staff report. Ask for the precise Council resolution, amount, conditions and next decision date.
$300,000 was approved for design. The $5.6 million Option 2B figure is a concept estimate, not proof of spending.
Missing in reviewed sourcesActual Phase 2 expenditures to date, remaining design funds, and a dated construction cost and funding reconciliation.
Who can clarify?District Finance and Engineering can identify the project accounting and updated cost report; Council considers funding decisions.
A 2024 announcement expected construction in 2025; the District later said it could begin as early as 2027–28.
Missing in reviewed sourcesA committed or forecast completion date, decision milestones, explanation of the timetable change and outcome measures for Phase 2.
Who can clarify?Engineering for the schedule and delivery plan; Council for approvals, priorities and public accountability.
Public resolution sought: Publish one dated, accessible decision summary showing commitments, legally authorized expenditures, actual costs, next Council decisions, schedule assumptions and measurable delivered results. If not yet decided, state “not decided” with the responsible office and next review point.
Constructive resident action: Check Council minutes, read the February 2026 decision, or submit the specific unanswered questions to Council. Correspondence placed on a Council agenda may become public; review the District's privacy guidance before including personal details.
Evidence boundary: Not located in this evidence set does not establish that a record does not exist, a law has been broken, or a promise was deliberately abandoned.
Estimated cost, authorized funding and actual expenditure are different facts. The following figures do not change when you change perspectives.
Phase 2 was discussed publicly with a 2025 construction expectation. In February 2026, Council authorized design work only, and the District said construction might begin in 2027 or 2028.
From a 2025 construction expectation to a 2027-2028 possibility: Council approved $300,000 for design and asked for an updated cost estimate. Actual Phase 2 spending and completed outcomes are not yet substantiated in this record.
Both readers accept the District's cited decision, cost estimates, feedback count and published schedule change. Neither treats an estimate as an expenditure.
They may prioritize avoiding exposure to vehicle traffic versus establishing the additional benefits and costs before approving construction.
Each statement links to a public municipal source, identifies its evidentiary class and states what would be an invalid inference. District publications are attributable sources, not independent audits.
External links open the original publisher. This prototype does not crawl pages, silently refresh sources or claim that a live page will remain unchanged.
| ID | Publication | Date | Limits |
|---|
Use the same five questions for Version A and Version B. Assign test versions externally and do not let testers switch arms mid-session. Answers stay on the device unless the tester explicitly exports them.
Facts include dates, source interests, uncertainty and limitations. The facts do not change with a lens selection.
Show where priorities, values, forecasts and proposed remedies differ without altering facts or manufacturing consensus.
Follow a public statement through Council authority, actual expenditure and observed results; leave missing links visibly unknown.